Fox News’ Jesse Watters Admits He Erred in Saying Newsom Lied About Trump Phone Call, but Governor Isn’t Dropping Lawsuit: ‘See You in Court, Buddy’
On July 18, 2025, Fox News host Jesse Watters made headlines when he admitted to a significant error concerning California Governor Gavin Newsom. Watters publicly acknowledged that he misstated Newsom’s honesty regarding a phone call with former President Donald Trump. This revelation comes on the heels of Newsom’s decision to file a defamation lawsuit against Fox News, for allegedly claiming he deceived the public regarding the timing of the controversial call.
The defamation suit was lodged on June 27, demanding a staggering $787 million in damages. This figure notably mirrors the settlement reached between Fox News and Dominion Voting Systems in April 2023 over another high-profile defamation case. During a recent episode of his show, Watters expressed regret, stating, “I’m sorry,” for inferring that Newsom had intentionally misled viewers. Yet, he didn’t shy away from criticizing the governor’s communication style, suggesting that Newsom’s statements surrounding the phone call were “confusing and unclear.”
The Background of the Controversy
The incident in question traces back to June 10, when Trump asserted he had spoken to Newsom just a day prior, hinting at a discussion about his management of protests linked to ICE raids in Los Angeles. However, Newsom vociferously disputed this narrative, asserting that no such call occurred. Watters aired a segment on his show that implied Newsom had lied, a pivotal argument in the ongoing defamation lawsuit.
Watters’ post-acknowledgment, the atmosphere surrounding the lawsuit intensified as representatives for Newsom indicated that the governor was unsatisfied with the show’s apology. They emphasized that Newsom was fully prepared to advance with the legal proceedings, cheekily stating, “Discovery will be fun. See you in court, buddy.” In contrast, Fox News responded to the accusation, labeling the lawsuit as a frivolous publicity stunt.
Implications for Media and Political Accountability
This saga underscores the escalating tensions between media outlets and political figures, particularly surrounding narratives of truth and misinformation. As the lawsuit progresses, it raises essential questions about journalistic ethics, standards, and the responsibility that news organizations bear when reporting on political figures and their conduct. This incident serves as a reminder to media professionals to uphold accuracy and accountability, especially in a politically charged environment.
Furthermore, the implications of this case extend beyond just the individuals involved. The attention it has gathered showcases the need for rigorous fact-checking and responsible reporting practices in news media. In an age where information spreads rapidly, often without adequate vetting, ensuring the integrity of reporting is paramount.
The Legal Battle Ahead
As the lawsuit unfolds, both parties are poised to face a complicated legal landscape. Newsom’s actions in pursuing justice may influence other political figures’ decisions to challenge media narratives head-on. This case represents not only a singular conflict between a politician and a media outlet but also a broader challenge facing journalism today. The outcome could set precedents for how defamation cases involving public figures are treated moving forward.
Ultimately, the confrontation between Jesse Watters and Gavin Newsom stands as a testament to the complexities of the modern media landscape. With public opinion often swayed by news portrayals, the stakes are high for both journalists and political leaders alike as they navigate this contentious terrain.
As viewers and consumers of news, it is crucial for us to remain vigilant and engaged with the evolving narrative while advocating for transparency and integrity in reporting. We invite you to follow the developments in this high-profile case closely, as it may have far-reaching implications for journalism and political accountability in the future.
